Iran nuclear negotiations relevant worldwide

In our increasingly globalized economy and world, circumstances thousands of miles away have become increasingly important. Though Iran may not be in our own backyard, the importance of a non-nuclear Iran justifies renewed sanctions.

Getting Iran, the world’s leading state sponsor of terror, to agree to the P5+1 talks was not easy. Though P5+1 may just seem like a complex algebra equation, it is a highly coordinated effort by the United States, Russia, China, France, the United Kingdom and Germany. Despite the prospect of a diplomatic solution still seeming far away, these nations should be applauded for their efforts.

Undeterred by these nations’ attempts at a diplomatic solution, Iran has continued to extend negotiations. A year and two extensions later, the fact that Iran must not be allowed to be capable of producing a nuclear weapon is one of the only points that American policy makers from both parties can agree upon. Due to extensions and gratuitous prolongation by Iran, both Democrats and Republicans have begun to assert that they will accept nothing less than a fair deal.

Suppressing Iran’s nuclear capabilities still appears daunting because of the consistent elongation. However, if talks do not come to fruition soon, the world may see a less peaceful solution than what was originally anticipated and hoped for. Located in the Middle East, Iran could rock the already tumultuous region by obtaining a nuclear weapon. The ramifications of a nuclear Iran would not just cause issues for our allies in the Middle East, but, down the road, they may lead to complications for American citizens at home as well as abroad.

Though the P5+1 talks are a diplomatic effort, they seem to be making very little headway at reaching a final solution. At this point in the diplomatic process, it would be prudent for the United States to re-institute economic sanctions – the diplomatic means that initially inclined Iran to begin the P5+1 talks.

Since the beginning of the P5+1 talks, Iran has received approximately 10 billion dollars in direct sanctions relief. This massive amount of direct sanctions relief was meant to incentivize Iran into reaching a diplomatic solution. However, much like Iran’s previous attempts to deceive IAEA investigators and the international community, Iran has continued to manipulate the diplomatic goodwill for their own benefit.

At this point in time, renewed sanctions appear to be the only diplomatic means capable of forcing Iran to do anything that isn’t in their own national interests. Critics of renewed economic sanctions fear that renewed sanctions will appear overly aggressive. In the face of these claims, however, many American policy makers from both sides of the aisle believe that aggressive economic sanctions are the only viable option to achieve a nonnuclear Iran.

New legislation introduced to Congress attempts to combat this problem. It is important to note that the upcoming legislation does not officially press for sanctions; instead, it gives the P5+1 one more chance to reach a diplomatic solution before the July 1 deadline. If a comprehensive solution is not met, it then allows Congress to legally sanction Iran.

Tougher economic sanction is in no way the solution. Rather, tougher economic sanction can be viewed as a diplomatic tool to incite a safe and fair end for all parties involved.

In the coming weeks, American policy makers have a very unique opportunity to facilitate an end to one of the world’s most terrifying propositions. As the world’s leading state sponsor of terror and Iranian precedent implies, it is essential that American policy makers from both parties vote for renewed sanctions to ensure a non-nuclear Iran.

Emma Light is a sophomore studying political science and economics.

February 1, 2015


Emma Light

ONE COMMENT ON THIS POST To “Iran nuclear negotiations relevant worldwide”

  1. Alden says:

    Iran is not making nukes. They have exactly zero weapons grade uranium (that’s above 90% pure u-235). Reuters last week said boo hoo they have almost enough 20% u-235 that if it wasn’t 20% at all but somehow I Dream of Jeannie showed up and used her magic to make it weapons grade allofasudden, then it would be enough for one bomb! — In other words, it’s the same lies you’ve been hearing for 10 years straight. They have been taking their small amounts of 20% and converting it to fuel plates for their American-built (back when their dictator was the CIA and Mossad’s torture sock-puppet, the Shah Reza Pahlavi, [some torture is okay, you see]) medical isotope reactor, *diminishing* their so-called “breakout capability” of stockpiled 20% and 3.6% u-235 that could conceivably be further enriched and used to make a bomb at some future date.

    (“Breakout” itself is a pretty meaningless term. They have way more than enough uranium ore in the ground to make a nuke someday too. If 3.6% and 20% count toward breakout capability, why doesn’t the metal that’s still in the ground, when it’s just as fissile — not at all?)

    You can check every IAEA report for a decade and despite all the hype about “we can’t prove an absolute negative like the UN Security Council mandated,” you will *always* find that when it comes to their actual job, “the agency has continued to verify the non-diversion of nuclear material in Iran to any military or other special purpose.” In other words, the IAEA has actually come as close as is logically possible to proving the negative — over and over again. Well, it’s all still there, I guess it ain’t anywhere else then.)

    In other words, liars have been lying to you, as they are want to do, and you must be determined to separate truth from hype if you want to avoid cheer-leading for another war based on ridiculous, and easily dis-proven lies.

    By the way, Iran is guaranteed the “unalienable right” to nuclear power and technology for peaceful purposes, and they have not violated the NPT or their Safeguards Agreement with the IAEA. It’s the US and our EU stooges who are in violation of our countries’ signatures to the NPT which promises we’ll respect that right (as well as disarm ourselves).

Around the Web
  • Miami Herald
  • UM News
  • Error

With the University of Miami season opener closing in, the next starting quarterback has yet to be n ...

The second fall scrimmage, closed to the media and public, is over. University of Miami coach Mark R ...

1. DOLPHINS: Fins any good? 'Dress rehearsal' may tell: Opening win, then lopsided loss. W ...

University of Miami linebacker Jamie Gordinier has had another unfortunate setback, effectively side ...

The calmest coach on the planet got mad Friday after football practice. University of Miami coach Ma ...

UM’s new chief academic officer holds some 40 patents, and in 2017 was inducted into the National Ac ...

University of Miami students and researchers are blogging during a month-long expedition in the Gulf ...

María de Lourdes Dieck-Assad, a world-renowned economist and former ambassador, fills a new role for ...

Through the U Dreamers Grant, DACA students find essential support as they pursue their college degr ...

UM students talk about their internships up north in a city that never sleeps. ...

RSS Error: A feed could not be found at http://www.hurricanesports.com/. A feed with an invalid mime type may fall victim to this error, or SimplePie was unable to auto-discover it.. Use force_feed() if you are certain this URL is a real feed.

TMH Twitter Feed
About TMH

The Miami Hurricane is the student newspaper of the University of Miami in Coral Gables, Fla. The newspaper is edited and produced by undergraduate students at UM and is published weekly on Thursdays during the regular academic year.