‘Chalking is not a crime’

Senior Reem Madkour chalks a message at the free speech rally at the Rock on Tuesday. The event was organized by S.T.A.N.D. (Students Toward A New Democracy), which was charged with vandalism by the Dean of Students Office for an incident involving children's sidewalk chalk. Carissa Harris // The Miami Hurricane

Students Toward A New Democracy (S.T.A.N.D.) is claiming that the University of Miami is censoring its freedom of expression.

This year, S.T.A.N.D. has criticized the university’s policies at the Life Science and Technology Park opening in Overtown. S.T.A.N.D. has been promoting its mission and efforts year-round but an incident March 8 caught the attention of the Dean of Students Office.

That night after the organization’s weekly meeting, members of the organization, along with other Overtown supporters, drew chalk messages like “STAND with Overtown” on sidewalks across campus.

“S.T.A.N.D. had seen other student organizations use chalk on campus and thought it was a great way to write positive messages and visually show the faculty and students our support of Overtown,” said senior Stephanie Sandhu, a member of S.T.A.N.D.

The chalking was a part of S.T.A.N.D.’s campaign advocating the development of a sustainable community benefits agreement between the university and the impoverished Overtown community.

Among other requests, S.T.A.N.D. has asked UM to fulfill its promise of delivering economic benefits and jobs for Overtown residents because of the funding behind the life science park. The project is partially funded by location-specific bonds, which are part of a federal program that allocates funds to areas that have significant poverty and unemployment as defined by the county.

The university said it has been doing everything possible to provide jobs to Overtown residents. S.T.A.N.D, however, believes these efforts fall short.
Sandhu and sophomore Antoine Romulus, both members of S.T.A.N.D., were called in to the Dean of Students Office in April.

At these meetings, the students were informed that S.T.A.N.D. was being charged with vandalism due to its chalk creations.

“It’s not about sidewalk chalk, it is about vandalism to the university,” said Dr. Ricardo Hall, dean of students. “It’s not about advertising and not about taking one position or another for any cause. Our office has no interest in that.”

According to Hall, S.T.A.N.D.’s chalking was reported, a necessary action for his office to begin investigation.

While S.T.A.N.D. used ordinary sidewalk chalk, an Overtown supporter used spray chalk for five messages.

“Facilities acted on it with a naked eye as if it was spray paint,” Hall said.

UMPD filed a vandalism report against S.T.A.N.D. citing almost $400 in reparation expenses for products to clean what they assumed was spray paint.
S.T.A.N.D. identifies these disciplinary actions as evidence of an infringement of free speech. The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) has joined with S.T.A.N.D. to investigate the allegations against the university.

“In fairness to the university we are collecting information to determine if in fact the university is selectively enforcing its code of conduct,” said UM alumnus John de Leon, president of the Greater Miami chapter of the ACLU. “If the university treats individuals and groups differently then they are participating in discipline based on message or association.”

In its Censorship Report, a document chronicling its grievances against the university, S.T.A.N.D. defends its chalking by comparing it to other student organizations’ chalk advertisements on campus like Golden Key International Honour Society.

In response to the administration, S.T.A.N.D. hosted an event Tuesday afternoon on the Rock promoting free speech on campus. Members brought chalk boards and attendees of the rally were able to freely chalk. Students sprawled messages on the boards like  “Free speech is sexy” and “Overtown has a voice.”

But some students believe that, by being a registered student organization, S.T.A.N.D. should comply with all campus policies and procedures.

“While obviously I agree that free speech is vital, people sometimes seem to forget that with rights come responsibilities,” junior Ryan Aquilina said. “The fact that any sort of free speech demonstration was able to happen proves that UM isn’t against free speech.”

Still, Sandhu noted the university may have censored the event on Tuesday: the Rock was double-booked and S.T.A.N.D. was only notified Monday; also, UMPD was asked to stand by during the rally.

“My classmates were scared to come,” Sandhu said. “What kind of academic environment do we live in if students are scared to support freedom of speech?”

According to Hall, however, the administration is not hindering free speech.

“There is a way to achieve your end goal and even prove a point without alienating people and without being disrespectful to members of the community, and hopefully S.T.A.N.D. will be able to strike that balance,” Hall said.

In fact, Hall wants the entire campus to be a free speech zone, a term used in the Student Rights and Responsibilities Handbook.

“Freedom of speech, in my estimation, doesn’t include things like property damage,” he said. “As long as you’re respectful, people would agree this is a place where different thought and different expressions are celebrated.”

Sandhu and S.T.A.N.D. hope that the student support at the rally Tuesday afternoon has led the dean’s office to realize the “unfairness” of the charges.

The investigation of S.T.A.N.D.’s alleged vandalism will be finalized in an upcoming hearing during which a decision about restitution will be made by the Dean of Students Office. The Dean of Students Office is not considering disbanding S.T.A.N.D.

Alexa Lopez may be contacted at

April 20, 2011


Alexa Lopez


8 COMMENTS ON THIS POST To “‘Chalking is not a crime’”

  1. David, it may be washable spray chalk, but it’s still spray chalk. It does look eerily similar to spray paint, and the last time I checked, chalking was still something frowned upon by the administration, unless you go through the proper channels. Again, there’s plenty of ways a student organization can express one’s views. Be it hanging a banner at the UC, be it holding organized rallies, and the like, there’s ways to get the job done.

    I watched as STAND invaded people’s classes to make their voices heard during the Unicco janitor strike. I was here when STAND members camped out in front of Ashe, making it impossible for students to carry out important business, because they wanted to express their views. The right to free speech doesn’t excuse one from being civil, and respecting the rights of others.

  2. Jacob says:

    Actually, the administrator here essentially admits that until confronted they knowingly mistated the truth and said it was spray paint.

    And, if you didn’t notice, the 21 page report (including emails and documentation) on their website details a number of actions taken by the administration that silence free speech- including blocking emails from STAND’s listerv.

    The whole community is watching, and as a graduate of UM (08′), I want my University to live up to its values and help my alma mater be what it can be.

    To me that report tells me that a small group of administrators arn’t doing that.

  3. Yeah, nothing says harm to someone else, damage to school property, and 1969 Berkeley more profoundly than easily washable spray chalk. Nathaniel Skinner, you are voice of the people.

  4. STAND isn’t immune to the consequences of their actions. Odds are, they wouldn’t have had any issues had they A) applied for the proper permits with the Dean of Students office, and B) not used spray chalk. STAND has no right whatsoever to use their right to freedom of expression to cause harm or damage to University property. Our right to free speech ends at the nose of another, or when it causes harm to someone else.

    If STAND is so passionate about exercising their free speech rights, why doesn’t the organization organize a peaceful protest at the Rock, or put up banners listing the facts of their argument? This isn’t UC-Berkeley, and this isn’t 1969. We have a pretty liberal administration, so it’s about time STAND uses the resources at their disposal instead of acting like a bunch of petulant children.

  5. seven says:

    The University will do anything possible to uphold a positive image even if it means treating certain people (Overtown residents, STAND members, anyone who dares speak out against them at all…ever) poorly. What STAND is trying to bring to light puts a very negative light on the university and our lovely administration just can’t handle that. They could have avoided this by approaching the Life Science Park appropriately from the beginning, but that’s a discussion for another day.

    While I agree with Ryan that being a student org comes with responsibilities, the administration needs to enforce those responsibilites with every org, not just the ones they dislike. And having been in many orgs during my four years at UM, I know for a fact that they absolutely do selectively enforce. Congrats to STAND for not giving up despite the scare tactics and blackmailing that i’m sure everyone from Whitely to Dean Hall to Dr. Green to Shalala are throwing at you. I actually think that in order to be hired by UM, they all had to get a degree in blackmailing and I know firsthand how difficult it can be to try and fight against them…but you’re doing the right thing!

  6. Richard says:

    It is so obvious that the administration is trying to prevent STAND from sharing the voices that are being ignored in Overtown. All i’ve ever seen STAND do is try to educate our campus so why is Dean Hall being so aggressive??

  7. Charles says:

    Restitution is to pay “damages,” not to decide on the restoration of the Org.
    But seriously, all this aggression over Sidewalk Chalk. That’s ridiculous.

  8. Dylan says:

    So the decision for “restitution,” will be made by the dean of students, who “is not considering disbanding S.T.A.N.D.”….?
    Then what’s the point of the charges?

Around the Web
  • Miami Herald
  • UM News
  • HurricaneSports

It was a good day for the Miami Hurricanes basketball team. They moved up to No. 6 in the AP Top 25 ...

Erykah Davenport and Shaneese Bailey made key plays back-to-back late in the game and four players s ...

1. MARLINS: Jeter's Fish trade Gordon. Stanton next?: While others spend -- like the Angels to ...

A six-pack of Hurricanes notes on a Thursday: ▪ With the first ever early signing period just two we ...

University of Miami coach Mark Richt and Wisconsin coach Paul Chryst sat on a stage poolside at the ...

Daniela Deu was drawn to both architecture and urbanism, believes architecture can change communitie ...

Canes Basketball player development assistant will graduate with MSED in Sport Administation. ...

UOnline graduate will earn his M.S. in Health Informatics ...

Seeking a college experience within a diverse community, this graduate found her home away from home ...

Graduating with Comedic Timing ...

Hurricanes earn highest ranking since March 2013. ...

Walker IV recorded a career-high 26 points, seven rebounds in the win over Boston U. ...

The University of Miami women's basketball team earned an impressive 65-54 win over No. 20/23 K ...

Miami senior wide receiver Braxton Berrios, a double major in finance and entrepreneurship, was name ...

After its longest break of the season thus far, the University of Miami women's basketball team ...

TMH Twitter Feed
About TMH

The Miami Hurricane is the student newspaper of the University of Miami in Coral Gables, Fla. The newspaper is edited and produced by undergraduate students at UM and is published weekly in print on Tuesdays during the regular academic year.